2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1993 Nissan 300 ZX

To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Nissan 300 ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Nissan 300 ZX would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Nissan 300 ZX (279 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2008 Cadillac CTS. (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Nissan 300 ZX should accelerate faster than 2008 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 205 kg more than 1993 Nissan 300 ZX.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Nissan 300 ZX (376 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Cadillac CTS. (300 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1993 Nissan 300 ZX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Cadillac CTS 1993 Nissan 300 ZX
Make Cadillac Nissan
Model CTS 300 ZX
Year Released 2008 1993
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3175 cc 2960 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 215 HP 279 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 376 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1790 kg 1585 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 4530 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1260 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2580 mm