2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 85 kg more than 2008 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac CTS | 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | CTS | Challenger |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5664 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 395 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2730 mm |
