2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1999 Nissan R 391
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan R 391. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan R 391 would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1999 Nissan R 391. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan R 391.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan R 391 (359 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Cadillac CTS. (233 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan R 391 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Cadillac CTS. 1999 Nissan R 391 has automatic transmission and 2008 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2008 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan R 391 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac CTS | 1999 Nissan R 391 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | CTS | R 391 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 4997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 233 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
