2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1078 kg more than 2001 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica has automatic transmission and 2008 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2008 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac CTS | 2001 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | CTS | Minica |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2350 mm |
