2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 2002 Holden Jackaroo
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden Jackaroo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden Jackaroo would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. (158 HP @ 3900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden Jackaroo weights approximately 300 kg more than 2008 Cadillac CTS.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. (333 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden Jackaroo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac CTS | 2002 Holden Jackaroo | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | CTS | Jackaroo |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5664 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 333 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 2045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2770 mm |