2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 2003 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (263 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2003 Ford Windstar. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Windstar.
Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac CTS | 2003 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | CTS | Windstar |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3066 mm |
