2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 2006 Ford E-150
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac CTS | 2006 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | CTS | E-150 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5664 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 132 L |