2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 2006 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2008 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2008 Cadillac CTS.

Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Cadillac CTS. (233 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Cadillac CTS 2006 Ford Ranger
Make Cadillac Ford
Model CTS Ranger
Year Released 2008 2006
Body Type Sedan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2597 cc 4016 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 179 HP 206 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 233 Nm 324 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.2 mm 100.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.6 mm 84.4 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 5150 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 3010 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 84 L