2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 2007 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Holden Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Holden Caprice would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (304 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2007 Holden Caprice. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2007 Holden Caprice.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac CTS (370 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden Caprice. (350 Nm). This means 2008 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden Caprice.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac CTS | 2007 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | CTS | Caprice |
Year Released | 2008 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3598 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 304 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 370 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |