2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 2009 Nissan Note
To start off, 2009 Nissan Note is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (263 HP) has 174 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 736 kg more than 2009 Nissan Note. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac CTS | 2009 Nissan Note | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | CTS | Note |
Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 89 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2600 mm |