2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Cadillac CTS would be higher. Both 2008 Cadillac CTS and 2010 Holden UTE are equipped with a 3,600 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2008 Cadillac CTS. (263 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2008 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Cadillac CTS. (343 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac CTS | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | CTS | UTE |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 281 HP |
| Torque | 343 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
