2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (395 HP) has 198 more horse power than 2012 Peugeot RCZ. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2012 Peugeot RCZ.
Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac CTS | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | Cadillac | Peugeot |
Model | CTS | RCZ |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5664 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 274 km/hour | 217 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.7 seconds | 7.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1359 mm |