2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Cadillac CTS would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 305 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Roadster (279 Nm @ 5100 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Cadillac CTS. (263 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac CTS | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mini |
| Model | CTS | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 263 Nm | 279 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.7 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3758 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1391 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2467 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |
