2008 Cadillac DTS vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2008 Cadillac DTS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac DTS (292 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac DTS weights approximately 972 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac DTS | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Cadillac | DAF |
| Model | DTS | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 292 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1638 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 33 L |
