2008 Cadillac DTS vs. 1989 ZIL 4104
To start off, 2008 Cadillac DTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,690 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 ZIL 4104 (312 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2008 Cadillac DTS. (292 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 ZIL 4104 should accelerate faster than 2008 Cadillac DTS.
Because 1989 ZIL 4104 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 ZIL 4104. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 ZIL 4104 (607 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Cadillac DTS. (391 Nm). This means 1989 ZIL 4104 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Cadillac DTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac DTS | 1989 ZIL 4104 | |
| Make | Cadillac | ZIL |
| Model | DTS | 4104 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 7690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 292 HP | 312 HP |
| Torque | 391 Nm | 607 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 108 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 104.9 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 6350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2100 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3890 mm |
