2008 Cadillac SRX vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2008 Cadillac SRX is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac SRX (254 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1405 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac SRX | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Cadillac | DAF |
Model | SRX | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3563 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2071 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 33 L |