2008 Cadillac SRX vs. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2008 Cadillac SRX is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac SRX (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (160 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2008 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac SRX (427 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm). This means 2008 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac SRX | 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
Model | SRX | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2008 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 3344 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2670 mm |