2008 Cadillac SRX vs. 1992 Rover 100
To start off, 2008 Cadillac SRX is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac SRX (255 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1019 kg more than 1992 Rover 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac SRX (345 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100. (135 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2008 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac SRX | 1992 Rover 100 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | SRX | 100 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1889 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1380 mm |