2008 Cadillac SRX vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2008 Cadillac SRX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2008 Cadillac SRX. (254 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2008 Cadillac SRX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 633 kg more than 2005 Volvo XC90.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo XC90 (381 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Cadillac SRX. (339 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Cadillac SRX.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac SRX | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | SRX | XC90 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3563 cc | 2922 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 381 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.1 seconds | 9.3 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2071 kg | 1438 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 12.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 72 L |