2008 Cadillac STS vs. 1970 ZIL 114
To start off, 2008 Cadillac STS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,998 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1970 ZIL 114. (254 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1970 ZIL 114. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 ZIL 114 weights approximately 1540 kg more than 2008 Cadillac STS.
Because 2008 Cadillac STS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 ZIL 114. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac STS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 ZIL 114 (580 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Cadillac STS. (427 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1970 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Cadillac STS.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac STS | 1970 ZIL 114 | |
Make | Cadillac | ZIL |
Model | STS | 114 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 6998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 254 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 580 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 3175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3770 mm |