2008 Cadillac STS vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2008 Cadillac STS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac STS weights approximately 1002 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2008 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1980 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac STS | 1980 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | STS | Colt |
Year Released | 2008 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1812 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2310 mm |