2008 Cadillac STS vs. 1981 Ford Probe
To start off, 2008 Cadillac STS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Probe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Probe would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac STS weights approximately 442 kg more than 1981 Ford Probe.
Because 2008 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac STS (427 Nm) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Ford Probe. (148 Nm). This means 2008 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Ford Probe.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac STS | 1981 Ford Probe | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | STS | Probe |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1981 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1812 kg | 1370 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 55 L |
