2008 Cadillac STS vs. 1992 Italdesign Columbus
To start off, 2008 Cadillac STS is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Italdesign Columbus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Italdesign Columbus would be higher. At 4,988 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Italdesign Columbus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac STS (321 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1992 Italdesign Columbus. (295 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1992 Italdesign Columbus.
Because 1992 Italdesign Columbus is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Cadillac STS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Italdesign Columbus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Italdesign Columbus (450 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Cadillac STS. (427 Nm). This means 1992 Italdesign Columbus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Cadillac STS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac STS | 1992 Italdesign Columbus | |
| Make | Cadillac | Italdesign |
| Model | STS | Columbus |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4565 cc | 4988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 295 HP |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 84.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 6000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 2200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3830 mm |
