2008 Cadillac STS vs. 1996 Isuzu Amigo
To start off, 2008 Cadillac STS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Isuzu Amigo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Isuzu Amigo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac STS (302 HP) has 171 more horse power than 1996 Isuzu Amigo. (131 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1996 Isuzu Amigo.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac STS (369 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Isuzu Amigo. (195 Nm). This means 2008 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Isuzu Amigo. 2008 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1996 Isuzu Amigo has manual transmission. 1996 Isuzu Amigo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac STS | 1996 Isuzu Amigo | |
Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
Model | STS | Amigo |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 131 HP |
Torque | 369 Nm | 195 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2340 mm |