2008 Cadillac STS vs. 2005 Scion xB
To start off, 2008 Cadillac STS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Scion xB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Scion xB would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac STS (321 HP) has 213 more horse power than 2005 Scion xB. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2005 Scion xB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac STS weights approximately 726 kg more than 2005 Scion xB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Scion xB, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac STS (427 Nm) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Scion xB. (142 Nm). This means 2008 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Scion xB.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac STS | 2005 Scion xB | |
Make | Cadillac | Scion |
Model | STS | xB |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 427 Nm | 142 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1812 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.5 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 45 L |