2008 Cadillac STS vs. 2006 Mazda MPV

To start off, 2008 Cadillac STS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac STS (469 HP) has 269 more horse power than 2006 Mazda MPV. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda MPV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac STS weights approximately 144 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2008 Cadillac STS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda MPV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac STS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac STS (595 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda MPV. (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda MPV.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Cadillac STS 2006 Mazda MPV
Make Cadillac Mazda
Model STS MPV
Year Released 2008 2006
Body Type Sedan Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4376 cc 2966 cc
Horse Power 469 HP 200 HP
Torque 595 Nm 271 Nm
Torque RPM 3900 RPM 3000 RPM
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 1416 kg
Vehicle Length 5030 mm 4820 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2850 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 12.4 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 18.1 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 15.7 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 75 L