2008 Cadillac STS vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Cadillac STS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Cadillac STS would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac STS (302 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Because 2008 Cadillac STS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac STS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac STS (369 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2008 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore. 2008 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac STS | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | STS | Commodore |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 369 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |