2008 Cadillac STS vs. 2013 Volvo S60

To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Cadillac STS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Cadillac STS would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2013 Volvo S60. (247 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo S60 weights approximately 53 kg more than 2008 Cadillac STS.

With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac STS (369 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo S60. (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo S60.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Cadillac STS 2013 Volvo S60
Make Cadillac Volvo
Model STS S60
Year Released 2008 2013
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3564 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V W
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 5 valves
Horse Power 302 HP 247 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 369 Nm 361 Nm
Torque RPM 5200 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 94.1 mm 82 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85.6 mm 93 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Acceleration 0-100mph 7.4 seconds 7.5 seconds
Drive Type 4WD AWD
Transmission Type Automatic CVT
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 1613 kg
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4628 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 2097 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1484 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2776 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.8 L/100km 6.6 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.8 L/100km 10.5 L/100km