2008 Cadillac XLR vs. 1959 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2008 Cadillac XLR is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 4,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 80 kg more than 2008 Cadillac XLR.
Because 1959 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac XLR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac XLR | 1959 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | XLR | Impala |
Year Released | 2008 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4371 cc | 3851 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3030 mm |