2008 Cadillac XLR vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Cadillac XLR is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac XLR (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 315 kg more than 1972 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2008 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac XLR | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | XLR | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4565 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2700 mm |