2008 Cadillac XLR vs. 1987 Volvo 240

To start off, 2008 Cadillac XLR is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 4,566 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac XLR (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1987 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1987 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 345 kg more than 1987 Volvo 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac XLR (421 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Volvo 240. (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Volvo 240. 2008 Cadillac XLR has automatic transmission and 1987 Volvo 240 has manual transmission. 1987 Volvo 240 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Cadillac XLR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: