2008 Cadillac XLR vs. 2004 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2008 Cadillac XLR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 4,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac XLR (444 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (200 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Express. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 842 kg more than 2008 Cadillac XLR.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac XLR (561 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Express. (339 Nm). This means 2008 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Express.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac XLR | 2004 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | XLR | Express |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4371 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 561 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 2402 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 117 L |