2008 Cadillac XLR vs. 2007 Ford E-150
To start off, 2008 Cadillac XLR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac XLR (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac XLR (420 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac XLR | 2007 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | XLR | E-150 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4566 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 226 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 132 L |