2008 Cadillac XLR vs. 2012 Renault Laguna
To start off, 2012 Renault Laguna is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Cadillac XLR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Cadillac XLR would be higher. At 4,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac XLR (444 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 2012 Renault Laguna. (204 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Laguna.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac XLR (561 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Laguna. (285 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2008 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Laguna.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac XLR | 2012 Renault Laguna | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | XLR | Laguna |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4371 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 561 Nm | 285 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 14.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 70 L |