2008 Chevrolet Avalanche vs. 2013 Ferrari 458
To start off, 2013 Ferrari 458 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chevrolet Avalanche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chevrolet Avalanche would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 665 kg more than 2013 Ferrari 458.
Because 2008 Chevrolet Avalanche is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ferrari 458. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Avalanche will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ferrari 458 (540 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Avalanche. (461 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2013 Ferrari 458 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Avalanche.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Avalanche | 2013 Ferrari 458 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ferrari |
Model | Avalanche | 458 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 9000 RPM |
Torque | 461 Nm | 540 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4527 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1937 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1211 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 86 L |