2008 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 1997 Rover 200
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Rover 200 weights approximately 205 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Rover 200 (185 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Aveo. (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Aveo | 1997 Rover 200 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Aveo | 200 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1994 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
Torque | 128 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.6 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2510 mm |