2008 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 2004 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 622 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Chevrolet Aveo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (320 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Aveo. (128 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Aveo | 2004 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
| Model | Aveo | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3966 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.6 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.5 mm | 87 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1622 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 72 L |
