2008 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 4,300 cc, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 906 kg more than 1952 Holden FX.
Because 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer (340 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Blazer | 1952 Holden FX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Blazer | FX |
Year Released | 2008 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2166 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 340 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1876 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2620 mm |