2008 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1965 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 4,300 cc, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 1136 kg more than 1965 ZAZ 966.
Because 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 ZAZ 966. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Blazer | 1965 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | ZAZ |
| Model | Blazer | 966 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 887 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 72.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 54.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1876 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2170 mm |
