2008 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,300 cc, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 214 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Blazer.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer (340 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (306 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Blazer | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Blazer | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2008 | 1994 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 3947 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 340 Nm | 306 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 94.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 71.1 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1876 kg | 2090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 93 L |