2008 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 4,300 cc, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 1006 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (103 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Blazer | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
Model | Blazer | R2 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 658 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 56 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 66.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1876 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 30 L |