2008 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 4,300 cc, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 311 kg more than 2003 Volvo C70.
Because 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Volvo C70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Volvo C70. (320 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Blazer | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Blazer | C70 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2401 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 241 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1876 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |