2008 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2004 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,300 cc, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 43 kg more than 2004 Jaguar XK.
Because 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (541 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Blazer | 2004 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Blazer | XK |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 4193 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 390 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 541 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1876 kg | 1833 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 75 L |