2008 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2005 Mazda B4000
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda B4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda B4000 would be higher. At 4,300 cc, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 846 kg more than 2005 Mazda B4000.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda B4000. (323 Nm). This means 2008 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda B4000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Blazer | 2005 Mazda B4000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Blazer | B4000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 4031 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 207 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 323 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 100.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1876 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 74 L |