2008 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2009 Hummer H2
To start off, 2009 Hummer H2 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 6,199 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Hummer H2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Hummer H2 weights approximately 1027 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Blazer.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Hummer H2 (564 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Blazer. (340 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Hummer H2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Blazer. 2009 Hummer H2 has automatic transmission and 2008 Chevrolet Blazer has manual transmission. 2008 Chevrolet Blazer will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Hummer H2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Blazer | 2009 Hummer H2 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Hummer |
| Model | Blazer | H2 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 6199 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 393 HP |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 564 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1876 kg | 2903 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 2020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 121 L |
