2008 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1955 Ford Crestline
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 4,453 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 690 kg more than 1955 Ford Crestline.
Because 1955 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1955 Ford Crestline | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Cobalt | Crestline |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2201 cc | 4453 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2940 mm |
