2008 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1955 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 230 kg more than 1955 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1955 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1955 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Cobalt | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2201 cc | 4785 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1520 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3000 mm |
