2008 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1995 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 2,201 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt (149 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1995 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 295 kg more than 1995 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt (206 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1995 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Cobalt | Midge |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2201 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |