2008 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt. (171 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt weights approximately 161 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt (226 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Cobalt | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Cobalt | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 55 L |