2008 Chevrolet Cobalt vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 2,201 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt (148 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Polo. (83 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Polo.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt (206 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volkswagen Polo. (122 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volkswagen Polo.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Chevrolet Cobalt 2006 Volkswagen Polo
Make Chevrolet Volkswagen
Model Cobalt Polo
Year Released 2008 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2201 cc 1388 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 83 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 206 Nm 122 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 2750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 4200 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2470 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 8.1 L/100km 6.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 49 L 45 L